The latest trade pact between the U.S. and European Union highlights a growing trend of higher tariffs, vague investment pledges, and limited clarity. Analysts are already comparing the deal to Trump’s earlier Phase One agreement with China, where purchase commitments fell short of targets.
Under the new deal, the EU agreed to a 15% tariff on key goods, along with $600 billion in investments and $750 billion in U.S. energy purchases by 2028. While the agreement lowers auto tariffs from 25% to 15% and sets a 15% rate for pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, steel, aluminum, and copper still face 50% tariffs.
Markets initially reacted positively, seeing reduced risks of further retaliation. But skepticism remains. Experts doubt the EU can meet the massive energy purchase target, noting U.S. fossil fuel exports to Europe were only $78 billion last year. Investment pledges are also seen as overly ambitious.
The deal underscores Trump’s strategy: focus on select industries to bring some production back to the U.S. while maximizing tariff revenue. However, the lack of legally binding terms leaves companies facing uncertainty, especially with an August 1 tariff deadline and ongoing talks with China.
China’s tariff rate, currently around 55%, remains a critical unknown. U.S. officials are negotiating for an extension beyond the August 12 deadline and seeking a meeting between Trump and Xi Jinping.
For companies with global supply chains, the details of sector-specific tariffs — particularly on semiconductors — will determine whether it makes sense to shift production. Smaller countries are also at risk, with Trump hinting most nations could face tariffs of 15–20%, potentially higher for those without major trade agreements.
With so many unanswered questions and limited details, businesses remain in limbo, waiting to see where U.S. trade policy lands next.
Comments
Post a Comment