US tariff uncertainty will likely remain a key market overhang, even after the Supreme Court of the United Statesstruck down tariffs imposed under the IEEPA, according to Malaysian research houses.
What Changed — And What Didn’t
After the court ruled against tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Trump announced:
10% global tariffs
Plan to raise them to 15% under Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act
Valid for 150 days, unless Congress approves an extension
Key issue:
Although legally different, protectionism remains intact.
Public Investment Bank noted Trump is unlikely to retreat, as tariffs are central to his foreign policy strategy.
Kenanga Investment Bank added:
New tariffs are capped at 15%
But US officials suggest tariff revenue levels will remain broadly unchanged
Meaning markets should not expect a dramatic policy reversal.
Refund Risk: US$130 Billion Question
Analysts flagged uncertainty over whether:
Over US$130 billion in tariffs already collected will need to be refunded
Any repayment:
Would likely face prolonged legal battles
Could complicate fiscal projections
This adds another layer of policy unpredictability.
What It Means for Malaysia
Malaysia is unlikely to emerge as a clear regional winner, analysts say.
While the 15% cap is lower than the earlier 19% rate cited for Malaysia, an existing reciprocal arrangement (not yet ratified) could keep the 19% rate in effect.
Compared to Vietnam and Thailand:
Malaysia’s trade surplus with the US is smaller
Relative upside is limited
Sector Impact
Potential Beneficiaries
Exporters, especially if tariff rates ease
Glove manufacturers
Select manufacturing players
Public IB top picks:
VS Industry Bhd
SKP Resources Bhd
Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd
Technology Sector: Mixed Outlook
Semiconductors and E&E products are currently exempt from US tariffs, limiting direct impact.
However, Kenanga warns of:
Order delays
Capex postponements
Margin pressure for EMS players
Project timing risks for ATE firms
Qualification delays for OSAT players if uncertainty drags on
Domestic Plays Preferred
Given trade volatility, Kenanga prefers:
Banks and broader domestic sectors
Domestic-facing names may offer:
More stable earnings visibility
Less exposure to global trade disruptions
Market Takeaway
The Supreme Court ruling does not remove tariff risk — it reshapes it.
Key risks ahead:
Ongoing legal uncertainty
Potential refund complications
Temporary 150-day tariff window
Policy escalation risk

Comments
Post a Comment