A Reuters report that Samsung Electronics is preparing to ship next-generation HBM4 memory to NVIDIA has stirred concerns about competitive pressure on Micron Technology . But for investors, this looks more like a headline risk than a thesis break . What’s the News? (In Plain Terms) Samsung is reportedly ready to start producing HBM4 chips as early as next month Initial shipments to Nvidia could begin soon HBM4 is the next upgrade cycle after today’s HBM3/3E used in AI accelerators This confirms that Samsung is back in the HBM race after lagging SK Hynix and Micron earlier in the AI cycle. Does This Hurt Micron? Short Answer: Not Much (Yet) 1. HBM Is Supply-Constrained, Not Demand-Constrained AI chipmakers (Nvidia, AMD, custom silicon players) are buying every HBM chip they can secure . This is not a “winner takes all” market — it’s a “everyone sells out” market . Even if Samsung qualif...
Malaysia’s ringgit breaking below 4.00/USD changes the equity leadership playbook. A strong MYR is not uniformly bullish or bearish — it reshuffles winners and losers across sectors.
Below is a clean who wins / who loses framework for navigating a strong-currency regime.
Who Wins from a Strong MYR
1) Index Heavyweights & Financials
Why they win:
Attract foreign inflows seeking currency + equity upside
Lower FX volatility improves valuation confidence
Balance sheets less sensitive to USD revenue translation
Key beneficiaries
Malayan Banking
CIMB Group Holdings
Market effect:
Stronger MYR + inflows = index resilience, even when exporters lag.
2) Utilities & Domestic Defensives
Why they win:
Revenue largely ringgit-denominated
Lower imported fuel, equipment, and capex costs
Viewed as safe allocations by foreign funds in EM rotations
Key beneficiaries
Tenaga Nasional
Telekom Malaysia
3) Importers & Consumer Staples
Why they win:
Lower input costs (raw materials, packaging, feedstock)
FX gains translate directly into margin expansion
Pricing power improves without raising consumer prices
Key beneficiaries
Spritzer
CCK Consolidated Holdings
4) USD-Debt Heavy Companies
Why they win:
FX appreciation reduces translated debt burden
Improves gearing, interest coverage, and refinancing optics
Net impact:
Balance-sheet relief > revenue translation drag.
Who Loses from a Strong MYR
1) Exporters with USD Revenue & Thin Margins
Why they lose:
USD sales translate into lower MYR revenue
Limited pricing power in competitive global markets
FX hedging is costly or unavailable for smaller players
Most exposed sectors
Rubber gloves
Certain electronics exporters
Low-value-added manufacturing
2) Price-Taker Export Industries
Why they lose:
Cannot easily raise USD selling prices
Strong MYR worsens relative competitiveness vs peers
FX gains squeeze margins faster than volume growth can offset
Typical risk profile:
High volume, low margin, tight working capital.
3) Exporters with Weak FX Hedging
Why they lose:
Currency gains hit earnings immediately
Hedging ties up liquidity and increases financing strain
Volatility complicates earnings visibility
Who Is Neutral / Mixed
Hedged Exporters & Commodity Players
FX losses partly offset by hedging strategies
Commodity pricing can dilute currency effects
Earnings impact depends on hedge ratio and timing
Big Picture Takeaway
A strong ringgit no longer equals a weak stock market.
This cycle:
Capital inflows + policy credibility are overpowering FX headwinds
Leadership shifts toward financials, defensives, and importers
Exporters must earn their keep via pricing power or efficiency
Strong MYR = stock selection market, not a broad market risk.
Comments
Post a Comment