KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 21 (Bernama) -- Bursa Malaysia ended little changed on Friday, as investors remained cautious amid renewed pressure on global bond yields and geopolitical tensions, an analyst said. At 5 pm, the FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI (FBM KLCI) eased 0.23 points to 1,736.48 compared with Thursday’s close of 1,736.71. The benchmark index opened 0.63 of a point lower at 1,736.08, and fluctuated between 1,733.13 and 1,738.30 throughout the day. On the broader market, losers outpaced gainers 637 to 578, while 571 counters were unchanged, 1,086 untraded and 47 suspended. Turnover decreased to 3.91 billion units valued at RM3.32 billion from 4.28 billion units valued at RM4.01 billion on Thursday.
Key Concerns & Credit Downgrade
- Municipal Market Analytics (MMA) downgraded its state-sector outlook from positive to neutral, citing “rapid and chaotic activity” from the Trump administration.
- Executive orders and policy shifts are threatening federal funding, which accounts for about one-third of state budgets.
- States may have to tap into reserves, cut or pause projects, and reduce aid to local governments, colleges, and hospitals.
Financial Implications
- Uncertainty in federal funding could impact essential services, particularly in education and healthcare.
- State housing finance agencies face higher risks, with possible negative actions on US government bond ratings.
- Potential elimination or reduction of the municipal bond tax-exemption poses a significant threat to state finances.
Rising Costs & Legal Challenges
- States are incurring higher costs due to policy disruptions, including:
- Increased expenses for advisors and consultants to evaluate alternatives.
- Higher litigation costs related to challenging federal government decisions.
- Despite “exceptional” reserve levels, states may face financial strain as they adjust to shifting federal policies.
Summary
- MMA downgraded its state-sector outlook to neutral from positive.
- Trump’s executive orders and funding uncertainties are destabilising state budgets.
- States may cut projects, tap reserves, and reduce local aid.
- Housing finance agencies and municipal bonds face higher risks.
- States are spending more on legal and advisory costs to navigate policy shifts.
Comments
Post a Comment