KUALA LUMPUR, July 31 (Bernama) -- Bursa Malaysia ended higher on Friday as investors continued to accumulate blue-chip stocks in line with stronger performances across most regional markets. At 5 pm, the FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI (FBM KLCI) rose 4.50 points to 1,724.90 from yesterday’s close of 1,720.40. The benchmark index opened 0.83 of a point higher at 1,721.23, and moved between 1,715.67 and 1,730.12 throughout the day. The broader market was positive with gainers outpacing losers 707 to 402, while 547 counters were unchanged, 1,085 untraded and 56 suspended. Turnover expanded to 3.03 billion units valued at RM3.56 billion from 2.49 billion units valued at RM2.25 billion on Thursday.
Key Concerns & Credit Downgrade
- Municipal Market Analytics (MMA) downgraded its state-sector outlook from positive to neutral, citing “rapid and chaotic activity” from the Trump administration.
- Executive orders and policy shifts are threatening federal funding, which accounts for about one-third of state budgets.
- States may have to tap into reserves, cut or pause projects, and reduce aid to local governments, colleges, and hospitals.
Financial Implications
- Uncertainty in federal funding could impact essential services, particularly in education and healthcare.
- State housing finance agencies face higher risks, with possible negative actions on US government bond ratings.
- Potential elimination or reduction of the municipal bond tax-exemption poses a significant threat to state finances.
Rising Costs & Legal Challenges
- States are incurring higher costs due to policy disruptions, including:
- Increased expenses for advisors and consultants to evaluate alternatives.
- Higher litigation costs related to challenging federal government decisions.
- Despite “exceptional” reserve levels, states may face financial strain as they adjust to shifting federal policies.
Summary
- MMA downgraded its state-sector outlook to neutral from positive.
- Trump’s executive orders and funding uncertainties are destabilising state budgets.
- States may cut projects, tap reserves, and reduce local aid.
- Housing finance agencies and municipal bonds face higher risks.
- States are spending more on legal and advisory costs to navigate policy shifts.
Comments
Post a Comment