Just past few weeks, a friend of mine just started to use his Paypal account. The purpose he opened a Paypal account is to sell stuff at some auction websites, which I'm not sure, though I strongly believe it could be Ebay. Anyway, he told me that he got a problem getting the money and it will serve no purpose if the money can only stay in the Paypal account and use for online business as he might want to cash out anytime soon. Anyway, I told him that there is actually a way to withdraw money to his bank account and then tell him step by step how to do it while we were on the phone.
Anyway, due to the phone conversation, I know some of us are not aware that we can actually withdraw the money to the banks in Malaysia.
Below are the step by step on how to do it beginning from registering a bank account to the Paypal account.
1. Login to your Paypal account. You should be getting something like the following screenshot.
2. Next, click on the Withdraw tab and you will see that you can withdraw money either direct to the bank account and to debit card or credit card. Click on the Withdraw to your bank account link to withdraw direct to the bank account without any charges, provided the amount is more than RM400.
3. After you click on the Withdraw to your bank account link, you will be directed to the following page.
If one withdraw money from Paypal account for the first time, he or she will need to setup a bank account to the Paypal account. To do so, click on the Add bank account link on the page. You will be directed to the page as shown below after you click on the Add bank account link.
4. Fill in the details required in the setup bank correctly. The MEPS bank routing code is actually the Malaysia bank Swift code. Double check the details so that you will be getting the money instead of the money going here and there. Click continue once filling in all the details. Confirm the details and then repeat step 2 (this is my shortcut way of getting to the right page). This time you can enter the amount in USD and if you have only one bank setup to the account, it will appear in the To column. If you have more than one bank account setup, just choose the correct bank account. Click continue when done.
5. Review your withdrawal information and click Submit to confirm the withdrawal information.
6. Finally, you will be directed to the following page stating that "Your funds will be in your bank account in 2-3 business days" as shown below. An email will be sent to your Paypal email account as well for your reference.
If I remember correctly, I always withdraw on Monday and get my money before Friday on the same week. Hope this helps.
Welcome to MONEY MASTER. Money Master is a financial management and money talk blog where our aim is to become the money master rather than the slave to the money. Making money is no easy job if you treat it as a burden but once money becomes your friend and work for you, that is when cash flows in. Becoming the money master rather than slave to it helps us redefine the whole idea of earning more - it's more like the money working for us.
Translate This Page
-
Stock Info Market Monitor Company Profile Intel Corporation designs, manufactures, and sells integrated circuits for computing and communic...
-
KUALA LUMPUR (Nov 6): Bursa Malaysia ended the first trading day of the week on a positive tone, with the benchmark index rising 1.02% to ...
Malaysia Bank Swift Code
What is Swift code? Swift code is known as ISO 9362 and is a standard format of Bank Identifier Codes approved by the International Organiza...
Sunday, August 29, 2010
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
The "Middle Income Trap"
I come across this article and thought it would be nice to share it out here to see what are other people's opinion on the Middle Income Trap that are facing by some of the developing nation like Malaysia currently.
China, Malaysia, Korea And the Middle Income Trap
I just learned a new term today that I know I will be using frequently in the future. The term is "middle income trap" and it crystallizes some of my previously discombobulated thoughts I have had regarding economic development. Let me explain.
This new term (for me) comes from a post by Michael Schuman on Time Magazine's Curious Capitalist blog, entitled, "Escaping the middle-income trap." The post focuses on how Malaysia's economic growth has been so consistently strong since World War II, yet has been slowing over the last few years and of how Malaysia just cannot seem to break into the league of developed nations. Schuman defines this "trap," as follows:
I returned a few days ago from Kuala Lumpur, the capital of Malaysia, where the talk of the town – well, at least among economists -- is the “middle-income trap.” What's that, you ask? A developing nation gets “trapped” when it reaches a certain, relatively comfortable level of income but can't seem to take that next big jump into the true big leagues of the world economy, with per capita wealth to match. Every go-go economy in Asia has confronted this “trap,” or is dealing with it now. Breaking out of it, however, is extremely difficult. The reason is that escaping the “trap” requires an entire overhaul of the economic growth model most often used by emerging economies.
The concept behind the “middle-income trap” is quite simple: It's easier to rise from a low-income to a middle-income economy than it is to jump from a middle-income to a high-income economy. That's because when you're really poor, you can use your poverty to your advantage. Cheap wages makes a low-income economy competitive in labor-intensive manufacturing (apparel, shoes and toys, for example). Factories sprout up, creating jobs and increasing incomes. Every rapid-growth economy in Asia jumpstarted its famed gains in human welfare in this way, including Malaysia.
However, that growth model eventually runs out of steam. As incomes increase, so do costs, undermining the competitiveness of the old, low-tech manufacturing industries. Countries (like Malaysia) then move “up the value chain,” into exports of more technologically advanced products, like electronics. But even that's not enough to avoid the “trap.” To get to that next level – that high-income level – an economy needs to do more than just make stuff by throwing people and money into factories. The economy has to innovate and use labor and capital more productively. That requires an entirely different way of doing business. Instead of just assembling products designed by others, with imported technology, companies must invest more heavily in R&D on their own and employ highly educated and skilled workers to turn those investments into new products and profits. It is a very, very hard shift to achieve. Thus the “trap.”
Schuman sees South Korea as "probably the best current example of a developing economy making the leap into the realm of the most advanced." Schuman sees Malaysia as a long way from making that same leap:
Malaysia, though, is quite far from where it wants to be. That's a bit surprising based on its remarkable recent history. Malaysia has been among the best performing economies in the world since World War II, one of only 13 to record an average growth rate of 7% over at least a 25-year period. The country has an amazing record of improving human welfare. In 1970, some 50% of Malaysians lived in absolute poverty; now less than 4% do. Yet Malaysians also feel that they've become somewhat stuck where they are. GDP growth has slowed up, from an annual average of 9.1% between 1990 and 1997 to 5.5% from 2000 and 2008. Meanwhile, other Asian economies have zipped by Malaysia. According to the World Bank, the per capita gross national income (GNI) of South Korea in 1970 was below that of Malaysia ($260 versus $380), but by 2009, South Korea's was almost three times larger than Malaysia's ($21,530 versus $6,760). Malaysia is getting “trapped” as a relatively prosperous but still middle-income nation.
Schuman does not see Malaysia making the leap. Its companies are not innovating. Its private investment is declining and it spends almost nothing on R&D. "If Malaysia is going to break the “trap,” it has to reverse all of these trends."
So what has made Korea so different from Malaysia?
Why has Korea jumped so far ahead? I think the reason is embedded in the different methods the two countries used to spur rapid growth.
Both countries relied exports to create rapid gains in income, but they did so differently. South Korea, from its earliest days of export-led development in the mid-1960s, had been determined to create homegrown, internationally competitive industries. Though Korean firms supplied big multinationals with components or even entire products, that was never enough – Korea wanted to manufacture its own products under its own brands. The effort was often a painful one – remember Hyundai's first disastrous foray into the U.S. car market in the late 1980s and early 1990s – but Korea is where it is today because its private companies have been working on getting there for a very long time, backed in full by the financial sector and the government.
Malaysia, on the other hand, relied much, much more on foreign investment to drive industrialization. That's not a bad thing – multinational companies provide an instant shot of capital, jobs, expertise and technology into a poor country. MNCs, however, aren't going to develop Malaysian products; that has to take place in the labs and offices of Malaysia's private businesses. But those businessmen have been content to squeeze profits from serving MNCs and maintaining their original, assembly-based business models.
I have for years viewed Korea as THE success story of Asia. In fact, whenever people tout China and act as though democracy is wholly incompatible with growth, I respond with Korea. You can see me making this point in this Commonwealth Club of San Francisco video of a "Doing Business in China" panel. Korea was at one time the second poorest country in the world, second only to Niger. Now, Seoul is more dynamic than Tokyo and Korea just continues to grow both economically and in terms of its political freedoms. Why is that? And why are countries like Malaysia and Thailand stuck in the middle ground? And what about China and Vietnam, will they be able to make "the leap?
Japan and Korea are important because they have spending power. Vietnam and Cambodia are important because they have very low wages. China is the most interesting because just three or four years ago, companies were going to China because of its low wages, but now, companies are going there to make money (mostly on the Coast) and going there to make things (more and more inland).
Where do Malaysia or Thailand fit into all this?
Malaysia and Thailand remind me a bit of the mid-size law firm. I can understand hiring the big firm for the big deal or the big case requiring a massive number of associates or legions of highly specialized partners. And I can understand hiring a highly efficient and focused small firm. But I rarely understand hiring the mid-sized firm, which usually tries to price itself along the same lines as the big firms, but without the corresponding depth or expertise. Why bother? And nothing against either Malaysia or Thailand, but I think many businesses have asked themselves this very question.
Source: China, Malaysia, Korea And the Middle Income Trap
What do you think?
China, Malaysia, Korea And the Middle Income Trap
I just learned a new term today that I know I will be using frequently in the future. The term is "middle income trap" and it crystallizes some of my previously discombobulated thoughts I have had regarding economic development. Let me explain.
This new term (for me) comes from a post by Michael Schuman on Time Magazine's Curious Capitalist blog, entitled, "Escaping the middle-income trap." The post focuses on how Malaysia's economic growth has been so consistently strong since World War II, yet has been slowing over the last few years and of how Malaysia just cannot seem to break into the league of developed nations. Schuman defines this "trap," as follows:
I returned a few days ago from Kuala Lumpur, the capital of Malaysia, where the talk of the town – well, at least among economists -- is the “middle-income trap.” What's that, you ask? A developing nation gets “trapped” when it reaches a certain, relatively comfortable level of income but can't seem to take that next big jump into the true big leagues of the world economy, with per capita wealth to match. Every go-go economy in Asia has confronted this “trap,” or is dealing with it now. Breaking out of it, however, is extremely difficult. The reason is that escaping the “trap” requires an entire overhaul of the economic growth model most often used by emerging economies.
The concept behind the “middle-income trap” is quite simple: It's easier to rise from a low-income to a middle-income economy than it is to jump from a middle-income to a high-income economy. That's because when you're really poor, you can use your poverty to your advantage. Cheap wages makes a low-income economy competitive in labor-intensive manufacturing (apparel, shoes and toys, for example). Factories sprout up, creating jobs and increasing incomes. Every rapid-growth economy in Asia jumpstarted its famed gains in human welfare in this way, including Malaysia.
However, that growth model eventually runs out of steam. As incomes increase, so do costs, undermining the competitiveness of the old, low-tech manufacturing industries. Countries (like Malaysia) then move “up the value chain,” into exports of more technologically advanced products, like electronics. But even that's not enough to avoid the “trap.” To get to that next level – that high-income level – an economy needs to do more than just make stuff by throwing people and money into factories. The economy has to innovate and use labor and capital more productively. That requires an entirely different way of doing business. Instead of just assembling products designed by others, with imported technology, companies must invest more heavily in R&D on their own and employ highly educated and skilled workers to turn those investments into new products and profits. It is a very, very hard shift to achieve. Thus the “trap.”
Schuman sees South Korea as "probably the best current example of a developing economy making the leap into the realm of the most advanced." Schuman sees Malaysia as a long way from making that same leap:
Malaysia, though, is quite far from where it wants to be. That's a bit surprising based on its remarkable recent history. Malaysia has been among the best performing economies in the world since World War II, one of only 13 to record an average growth rate of 7% over at least a 25-year period. The country has an amazing record of improving human welfare. In 1970, some 50% of Malaysians lived in absolute poverty; now less than 4% do. Yet Malaysians also feel that they've become somewhat stuck where they are. GDP growth has slowed up, from an annual average of 9.1% between 1990 and 1997 to 5.5% from 2000 and 2008. Meanwhile, other Asian economies have zipped by Malaysia. According to the World Bank, the per capita gross national income (GNI) of South Korea in 1970 was below that of Malaysia ($260 versus $380), but by 2009, South Korea's was almost three times larger than Malaysia's ($21,530 versus $6,760). Malaysia is getting “trapped” as a relatively prosperous but still middle-income nation.
Schuman does not see Malaysia making the leap. Its companies are not innovating. Its private investment is declining and it spends almost nothing on R&D. "If Malaysia is going to break the “trap,” it has to reverse all of these trends."
So what has made Korea so different from Malaysia?
Why has Korea jumped so far ahead? I think the reason is embedded in the different methods the two countries used to spur rapid growth.
Both countries relied exports to create rapid gains in income, but they did so differently. South Korea, from its earliest days of export-led development in the mid-1960s, had been determined to create homegrown, internationally competitive industries. Though Korean firms supplied big multinationals with components or even entire products, that was never enough – Korea wanted to manufacture its own products under its own brands. The effort was often a painful one – remember Hyundai's first disastrous foray into the U.S. car market in the late 1980s and early 1990s – but Korea is where it is today because its private companies have been working on getting there for a very long time, backed in full by the financial sector and the government.
Malaysia, on the other hand, relied much, much more on foreign investment to drive industrialization. That's not a bad thing – multinational companies provide an instant shot of capital, jobs, expertise and technology into a poor country. MNCs, however, aren't going to develop Malaysian products; that has to take place in the labs and offices of Malaysia's private businesses. But those businessmen have been content to squeeze profits from serving MNCs and maintaining their original, assembly-based business models.
I have for years viewed Korea as THE success story of Asia. In fact, whenever people tout China and act as though democracy is wholly incompatible with growth, I respond with Korea. You can see me making this point in this Commonwealth Club of San Francisco video of a "Doing Business in China" panel. Korea was at one time the second poorest country in the world, second only to Niger. Now, Seoul is more dynamic than Tokyo and Korea just continues to grow both economically and in terms of its political freedoms. Why is that? And why are countries like Malaysia and Thailand stuck in the middle ground? And what about China and Vietnam, will they be able to make "the leap?
Japan and Korea are important because they have spending power. Vietnam and Cambodia are important because they have very low wages. China is the most interesting because just three or four years ago, companies were going to China because of its low wages, but now, companies are going there to make money (mostly on the Coast) and going there to make things (more and more inland).
Where do Malaysia or Thailand fit into all this?
Malaysia and Thailand remind me a bit of the mid-size law firm. I can understand hiring the big firm for the big deal or the big case requiring a massive number of associates or legions of highly specialized partners. And I can understand hiring a highly efficient and focused small firm. But I rarely understand hiring the mid-sized firm, which usually tries to price itself along the same lines as the big firms, but without the corresponding depth or expertise. Why bother? And nothing against either Malaysia or Thailand, but I think many businesses have asked themselves this very question.
Source: China, Malaysia, Korea And the Middle Income Trap
What do you think?
Sunday, August 22, 2010
Buying Handheld TV
With everything going mobile, one might be tempted to get a handheld TV as well especially among the movie lovers. While others might be curious that why he or she should be getting a handheld TV instead of more advanced portable media players like Ipod, well, you pay what you get. Handheld TV is made for TV lovers who plan to install the TV in their cars, or bring their TV set around to watch their favourite TV series and portable media players like Ipod requires one to download the media files from website instead.
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
How Rich Is Rich?
I come across one very interesting article from Personal Finance News from Yahoo! Finance - How Rich is Rich and think it might be suitable for me to share it out here and let us really ponder about the article and think how much does it need for you to feel rich?
How much money do you need to feel rich?
Wealth is a subjective concept, but one thing is universal in most definitions: being able to live a comfortable life without having to work.
"I'd like to have enough money so my family and I wouldn't have to work anymore or worry about the necessities, and maybe travel a bit," said Deborah Veale, a Southern California resident visiting New York City.
Veale said she'd need about $10 million to consider herself set.
One woman from Seattle put it at a "couple thousand dollars a month." Another from New York City wanted a billion (although she'd still fly coach.)
Experts peg the figure to be somewhere around $2 million to $12 million in savings.
On the high end of that range, a single person living in an expensive part of the country (say, New York City), wanting to retire at 35 would need at least $300,000 a year to feel rich, according to Steven Kaye, president of Watchung, N.J.-based wealth management firm American Economic Planning Group. He based that number on real-life figures his clients tell him they need.
A yearly income of $300,000 would allow for taxes, a $3,800-a-month apartment (the average price in Manhattan), and a monthly spending allowance of around twelve grand, he said. Not too bad, especially since you could do this all without a pesky job.
To generate $300,000 a year beginning at age 35, you'd need a nest egg of just under $12 million. That assumes a conservative investment portfolio generating a return of 5% a year, an inflation rate of 2.5% a year and Social Security benefits of $25,000 a year starting at age 62.
Over time, the shape of your nest egg would resemble a bell curve, growing in the early years, and then declining as inflation required you to withdraw more money to maintain a lifestyle equivalent to $300,000 in 2010. The $12 million would finally dwindle to $934 when you turned 100.
If you live in a low cost part of the country, $100,000 a year should be enough, said Kaye. In that case, you would need savings of about $4 million to retire at 35.
But if you're willing to stay in the workforce until age 65, a mere $2 million would be enough.
Jon Duncan, a financial planner at Tacoma, Wash.-based Seneschal Advisors, gave numbers similar to Kaye's, and agreed that for most people, the figure would be somewhere in the multi-millions.
"I'm from an era when we'd talk about millionaires and say 'Whoa, he's got it made for life,'" said Duncan. "But that's not the case anymore."
Indeed, few experts think a million is enough to quit your day job.
"Don't retire at 35," he advised this reporter, "you'll need a ton of money."
Keeping Up With the Joneses
Of course, there are other ways of determining wealth besides just what you'll need to live well in retirement.
Although decidedly not recommended by financial planners, one is relativity. Basically, you're rich if you're making more than your brother-in-law.
That appears to be how the government measures affluence. The Obama administration wants to extend tax cuts for all but the wealthiest Americans, which it defines to be those families making more than $250,000.
But that only includes about 2% of the population, according to the Census Bureau.
Kaye cautions not to confuse wealth with income. Some people can make a million a year, but be spending a million and a half. They are not rich, said Kaye.
"Income relates to lifestyle," he said. "Wealth relates to balance sheets."
Thursday, August 5, 2010
Are You a Wealth Accumulator?
There is this book called The Millionaire Next Door by Thomas J. Stanley and William D. Danko regarding the process of every one to accumulate great wealth. Don't get me wrong, this book is not giving the tips on how to get rich in 5 minutes, but rather the slow and steady process of successfully accumulating wealth.
According to the book, there is a formula to calculate or benchmark whether a person has successfully accumulate wealth according to their age and income and it summarizes into the following:-
Multiply your age by your gross annual income from all sources except inheritances. Divide this by ten. This, less any inherited wealth is what your net worth (excluding home equity) should be.
There are few classification of wealth accumulator and is as follow:-
The formula actually quite make sense because a doctor might be making a whole lot more money than a janitor, yet because the doctor spend excessively, he or she is actually a UAW while the janitor might be AAW or UAW because of his or her habit of accumulating wealth. Age also comes into play in determining whether a person is a wealth accumulator or not because the older you get, you will eventually have higher net worth.
Let's look at the following scenario:-
A and B is earning 50K and 100K respectively and both of them are of same age at 30 years old.
According to the formula,
A = 50, 000 x 30 / 10 = 150, 000
B = 100, 000 x 30 / 10 = 300, 000
Both A and B are AAW if both of them have 150K and 300K in net worth respectively. But should A has net worth the same as an AAW B which is 300K, then A is a PAW. On the other hand, should B manage to accumulate net worth as an AAW A which is 150K, then he or she is UAW.
According to the book, there is a formula to calculate or benchmark whether a person has successfully accumulate wealth according to their age and income and it summarizes into the following:-
Multiply your age by your gross annual income from all sources except inheritances. Divide this by ten. This, less any inherited wealth is what your net worth (excluding home equity) should be.
There are few classification of wealth accumulator and is as follow:-
- A prodigious accumulator of wealth (called a PAW throughout the book) has a net worth twice as high as this formula.
- An under accumulator of wealth (UAW) has a net worth under half of this.
- An average accumulator of wealth (AAW) who has the net worth between half the formula and twice the formula.
The formula actually quite make sense because a doctor might be making a whole lot more money than a janitor, yet because the doctor spend excessively, he or she is actually a UAW while the janitor might be AAW or UAW because of his or her habit of accumulating wealth. Age also comes into play in determining whether a person is a wealth accumulator or not because the older you get, you will eventually have higher net worth.
Let's look at the following scenario:-
A and B is earning 50K and 100K respectively and both of them are of same age at 30 years old.
According to the formula,
A = 50, 000 x 30 / 10 = 150, 000
B = 100, 000 x 30 / 10 = 300, 000
Both A and B are AAW if both of them have 150K and 300K in net worth respectively. But should A has net worth the same as an AAW B which is 300K, then A is a PAW. On the other hand, should B manage to accumulate net worth as an AAW A which is 150K, then he or she is UAW.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Labels
Investment
News
share market
bursa malaysia
FBM KLCI
market daily report
stock
stock market
Brokers Report
Malaysia
Financial Management
brokers call
Personal Finance
research report
Financial
Economy
General
stock investment
Money
Articles
FBMKLCI
Stocks
market
PublicInvest Research
Budget
Wall Street Update
PublicInvest research report
Wall Street
KLCI
oil & gas
1MDB
Hong Leong Investment Bank research report
Personal Opinion
Dow Jones
Issue
US
bursa
Credit Card
Debt
Kenanga research report
equity market
kenanga research
oil price
politics
ringgit
Market Watch
PPP
klse
najib
property development
Malaysia Weekly Highlights
Nasdaq
oil
property
thoughts
EPF
Hong Leong Investment Bank Research
Income Tax
construction
Maybank Research
Misc
Money Master
Najib Razak
S&P 500 Index
The Edge Financial Daily
US stock market
bank negara
weekly
weekly investment term
China
Companies in Focus
Inflation
Loan
Rules
Theedgemarkets
business
maybank
plantation
s&P 500
warren buffett
Crude Oil
Insurance
MIDF research report
Maybank IB research
Retirement Planning
Reuters
business news
finance
global
opinion
spending
stocks with momentum
technology
Bank
Brokers
Feng Shui
OPEC
Savings
Wealth
bear market
currency
financial services
global market
investing
microsoft
wallstreet
1 Malaysia Development Bhd
1Malaysia Development Bhd
BNM International Reserves
Billionaire
Budget 2016
Commodity
Disney
Investment Term
Malaysia News
PCB
Petronas
Richest People
STD
Saudi Arabia
bloomberg
british american tobacco
gaming sector
low oil price
media
publicInvest
russia
share investment
stock pick
telecommunication
top glove
trading
wallstreet update
weakened Ringgit
2010
2016
Air Asia
America
Bad Debt
Bill Gates
Billy Toh
Budget 2017
Calculation
Chinese New Year
Currency Exchange
Education
Fed
Forex
Gold
IPIC
Income
Iran
Kenanga Research research report
Lembaga Tabung Haji
MAS
Macquarie research report
Oil & Gas sector
Quote
RHB
Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA)
Star Wars
Star Wars: The Force Awakens
US Fed hike
affin hwang capital
airasia
analyst
apple
axiata
bearish market
business highlights
construction & engineering
consumer products
dow jones industrial average
earnings report
equity
expenses
global bear market
healthcare
hup seng industries berhad
inari
inari amertron berhad
interest rate
learning
malaysia airlines
market news
maybank investment bank
oil and gas
oil palm plantation
oil prices
opr
overnight policy rate (OPR)
s&P500
s&p
satya nadella
scandal
thought
thought of the day
2013
2014
Bank Negara reserves
Broker Report
Budget 2020
Cash Rebate
Donald Trump
Earn
Financial Planning
Financial World
Forbes
Global Competitiveness Report
Global News
Global semiconductor sales
Goldman Sachs
Good Debt
How The Rich Get Richer
IOI Corp Bhd
India
Intelligent Investor
Interest Rates
Linear Income
M&A Securities
Mahathir
Malaysia Business Highlights
Maybank 2 card
P1
Passive Income
Privacy Policy
PublicInvest Bank research report
REIT
RHB Investment Research
RHB Research Report
RM
SIA
Sector review
TA Research
TM
TPPA
Telekom Malaysia
Tun Dr Mahathir
US news
USD
USD against MYR
United States
Wall Street Journal
World Economic Forum
Zeti
airasia x
airlines
apple inc
asset allocation
automotive
aviation sector
azure
banking sector
bat
beverage
bonds
box office
brent crude
budget 2015
bumi armada
buy property
cash
consumer discretionary
default
developer
electricity tariff hike
engineering
financial market
global economy
greece
gst
home
hong leong investment bank
house
infrastructure
iphone
jobs
kossan rubber industries
macquarie equities research report
malaysia Ringgit
market close
market updates
mukhriz
nadella
new era for oil
opinions
pipeline services
politic
public bank
random
rate hike
research
retirement
ringgit crisis
sector update
semiconductor
semiconductor sales
semiconductor sector
shale producers
share
sime darby
stock market. oil & gas industry
tax
technical analysis
telco sector
the edge
weekly news
world market
0% Easy Payment Plan
1MDB scandal
1mdb story
20 cents
2009
2011
29 minutes
3.25%
53 cost cutting measures
7-eleven
9 Things Rich People Do Differently Every Day
ABNxcess
AFP NEWS
AMMB
Abu Dhabi fund
AirAsia X Bhd
Alcohol
AmInvestment Bank research report
Amazon
Ambank
Aminvestment research report
Ann Joo
Ann Joo Resources Bhd
Anwar
Apple watch
Asia
Asian stock market
Avengers
BIMB Securities Research
BJ Auto
BP Plastics Holding Bhd
BSI Singapore
Bailout
Banking and finance sector
Benjamin Graham
Biden
Bio Osmo
Book
Borneo Oil Bhd
CIMB
CLIQ Energy Bhd
CPO export tax
CPO price
CSI 300
Carlos Slim
Carlsberg
Cepatwawasan Group Bhd
Charts
China General Nuclear Power Corp
China's bond market
China's wealthiest man
Christmas
Circuit breaker
Citibank Cash Back card
Commodity Watch
Credit
Customer Service
DSKH Holdings (M) Bhd
Dagang NeXchange Bhd
Datasonic Group Bhd
David cameron
Debt Status
Deficit
Deloitte
Dividend
Domestic news
Dutch Lady Milk Industries Bhd
E.U
ECB
EON
Eastern & Oriental Bhd
Eco World
Eco World Development Group Bhd
Edra
Euro
Europe Central Bank
European Union
Evergreen
External Trade
FPSO Genesis
Fed rate hike
Federal Reserves
Federal rate
Fitbit
Fitbit Inc
Gamuda
Genting Malaysia Berhad
George Kent (M) Bhd
Global Competitiveness Index
Global Issue
Gordon Growth
Greece exit
Greed is Good
Guan Chong Bhd
Guinness
HSBC
Hasbro
Hektar Reit
Hiap Teck Ventures Bhd
Highlights
Hillary Clinton
Hock Seng Lee
Hong Leong Bank Bhd
Hong Leong Bank Investment research report
Hong Leong Bank Wise card
Hong Leong Industries Bhd
ICB
IMF
INTC
IPO
IPOs
IT
Ibraco Bhd
Intel Corporation
International Petroleum Investment Company (IPIC)
Islamic Banking and finance sector
Ismail Sabri
JF Apex Securities
JF Apex Securities Research
Janet Yellen
Jerasia Capital Bhd
Junk
KNM
KNM Group Bhd
KVMRT 2 Investment
KWSP
Keep Up With The Joneses
Khir Toyo
LHDN
Leissner
Lim Kit Siang
Lucasfilm
M+ online Market Wrap
MARA
MH370
MIDA
MISC Bhd
MLTA
MPC
MRTA
MSN Money News
Madza
Malaysia Airports Holdings
Malaysia Banking
Malaysia Bond Market
Malaysia fund
Malaysian Palm Oil Board
Malaysian Ringgit
Mara Digital Store
March CPO export tax
Maxis
Maybankard 2 Card
Microsoft in the new era
Millionaire Next Door
Mistakes
Motivation
N2N Connect
NAP 2014
NTPM Holdings Bhd
Nazir Razak
News Update
News at a Glance
Nikkei
O&G
OCBC
OPEC war
OSA
Obama
Office 365 Windows 10
Oil Watch
PTPTN
Packet One
Parkson
Paypal
Perdana
Perisai
Petronas Chemicals Group Bhd
Petronas Gas Bhd
Pintaras Jaya Bhd
Pioneer Natural Resources Co
Power
Practical ways on spending
Prestariang Bhd
Public Investment Research
PublicInvestresearch report
RBC Capital Markets
RCP average poll of US election
RGB International Bhd
RHB Research
RM crisis
RM2.6 billion
ROE
Ranhill Holdings Bhd
Rants
Rating
Raya holiday
Recession
Ringgit's volatility
SEM
SKB Shutters Corp Bhd
SME segment
SP Setia
SRR
Saizen REIT
SapuraKencana
Seacera Group Bhd
Shale oil
Sime Darby Bhd
Simee Darby
Singles
Stimulus Plan
Stock Selection for the Enterprising Investor
Sunway Construction Bhd
Superlon Holdings Bhd
Swift Code
TIME
TMI
TNB
TOYOTA
TRC Synergy
Tan Sri Tony Fernandes
Tax Reliefs
Technorati
Tenaga
Tenaga Nasional Bhd
The Citizens Declaration
The Edge Weekly
The Negative Side
The New York Times
Tim Cook
Titijaya Land Bhd
Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
Trump v Clinton
Tsipras
U.K
UEM Edgenta Bhd
UMNO
UMW Oil & Gas
UOA
US Box Office
US election
US fed
US manufacturing data
US market
US patent and trademark
US prosecutors
US stocks
USA
USD/MYR
USEconomy
Uchi Technologies Bhd
Ultra-Rich Networth individuals
UniFi
United Kingdom
Uob one card
Versatile Creative Bhd
W-8BEN
WCT Holdings
Wahid
Wal-Mart
Wall Street support
Warren's Way
Windows 10
Yak Yew Chee
Yellen
Yinson Holding
abenomics
aemulus
affordable housing
ahmad bashah
ahmad zahid
airline
airports
alibaba
alternative investment
aluminium
asian market
audit
automobile
azure machine learning
bank negara malaysia
below $30 a barrel
berjaya auto bhd
berjaya food
bond market
borneo utara highway
brexit
britain
broadband
budget 2018
budget revision
bulk purchase of property
bullish
bullish market
burse
cloud computing
cocoa
coffee
consumer staples
consumption power
cost of having a baby
crane
customer
data
debt investor
deflation risk
development
downpayment for your home
early election
earnings per share
economic outlook
economic outlook 2016
economic sanction
economics
economy outlook
ecoworld
effective gross income
egi
election
election budget
electric utility
electricity
electricity bill
electricity production
endowment plan
energy sector
entertaiment
eps
essay
european central bank
eversendai
eversendai corp
export data
family
food beverage
food services
forecasts
foreign-worker levy hike
fundamental questions on retirement
genting group
genting plantation
george soros
global energy
global stock market
globetronic
glove
goldman
great eastern
group purchase of property
has oil bottom?
health
higher price
home business
household & Personal product
how low can ringgit drop?
humor
industrial package
industry product
interest
internet
investment income
investment plan
investment strategy
iraq
jack ma
jack ma ready to take on the world
jaks resources bhd
japan
jobless
kimlun
klci index
knowledge
land reclaimation work
lawsuits
life
lifestyle
lifestyle inflation
liquefied natural gas (LNG)
machine learning
maintain buy
malaysia government
managing debt
manchester united
manufacture polyrethane product
manufacturing
marine engineering
market closing
market outlook
markets
mazda
medical insurance
metering
microsoft earnings
middle class
monetary policy committee
moneymaster
mortgage
movie
negative
nestle
noon market
offshore marine support services
oil & gas services
oil gain
oil madness
oil market
oil production
oil rally
oil&gas
oldtown
opr hike
patent
petrol
petrol chemical
petroleum
petronas gas
pipeline project
positive
power generation
power plant
prime minister
primus pacific
private placement
profitability ratios
project reference
property & infrastructure
property development and investment
putrajaya
quantitative easing
relative strength index (RSI)
renewable energy
reputational risk
resources
retail
retailing
retirement fund
rhb research institute
risk
risks
ruble
salesforce
sapurakencana petroleum
savings for retirement
scicom
scientex
scomi energy services bhd
sector
sell
share markets
share price
shinzo abe
shipbuilding
shopping mall
stagnation
star publication (M) bHd
starbucks
statistics
steel
stock market bursa malaysia
stock market investment
stock price
swiss
swiss bank
takaful
tech
technical indicator
telco
the malaysian insider
the star
thermo-vacuum form plastic packaging manufacturer
time value money
top gainers
top losers
trade volume index (TVI)
traditional healthcare
uchi tech
umw holdings
upstream oil & gas
ursa malaysia
value of compounding
wal-mart effect
warren buffet
water related engineering
wearable tech
webe
windows
worldwide sales
zecon